As our course progresses and I continue learning more about mathematics and how it should look in the classroom, I find myself contemplating concepts/ideas that I had never really given much thought to before. Before reading chapter two in the text and attending class on Thursday, I would have been one of the first people to say math is a "black and white/right or wrong" kind of subject. I guess that opinion stemmed from my experiences with mathematics growing up. There was only one right answer and one way to get to that answer. Any "workings" that didn't support the teacher's method and any answer that didn't match the one in the back of the book was automatically wrong. Honestly it never really bothered me though, because I was one of the lucky ones who easily got the right answer, showed the "right" workings and never really asked questions. However, after reading the text, math is not about regurgitating facts without even thinking about the process or why we use it. As our text states:
"Doing mathematics means generating strategies for solving problems, applying those approaches, seeing if they lead to solutions..." (pg. 10, 3rd ed)
Because of my past experiences, I am still programmed to worry about the right answers of problems instead of on the strategies and processes created to solve them. When completing the problems in chapter two, it was actually really bothering me that the answers were not in the book. I especially wanted to know the answer to the "Two Machines, One Job" problem on page 13. It really bothered me that the two different answers given could be backed up so well... how could they both be right? Or could they? I guess this is where it finally clicked for me that the creating of strategies and being able to "back up" the process is equally (or more) important than the answer itself. We all have to use mathematics everyday in our lives to solve problems. When we try to actively solve our day to day problems there are no easy methods/answers - there are only strategies and approaches that we have to come up with and test on our own. Students should be taught to solve problems in the classroom like they will have to do it in the real world. Therefore, "right" answers shouldn't be everything, nor should one method be considered the ONLY method to get there.
As a final thought, I believe that mathematics can indeed be considered a humanity. Math is always changing. New methods and theories are constantly replacing old ideas and it isn't as black and white as some might believe. With new teaching methods requiring students to think about, analyze and test possible solutions to problems, it suddenly becomes less of a repititive 2+2=4 "just because" but rather a way to solve everyday problems in more than one "right" way.


